1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2002 Volvo S60. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 259 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Volvo |
| Model | Tiger | S60 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 2319 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1399 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
