1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2010 GMC Yukon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Yukon (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1393 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Sunbeam | GMC |
Model | Tiger | Yukon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Size | 4259 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 2533 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 98 L |