1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | Fronte | Ranger |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4690 mm |