1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac DTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 648 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | Triumph | Cadillac |
Model | 2000 | DTS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2936 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |