1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 300 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Triumph | Suzuki |
Model | 2000 | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 63 L |