1966 Triumph Vitesse vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1966 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Triumph Vitesse | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Triumph | Volkswagen |
| Model | Vitesse | Polo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1420 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |
