1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 1964 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 1967 Abarth 1300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1967 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1967 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 540 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar E-Type (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Abarth 1300. (133 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1964 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth 1300 | 1964 Jaguar E-Type | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 1300 | E-Type |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 4235 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 385 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 92.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 63 L |
