1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2006 Ford Mustang. (210 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 455 kg more than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Mustang. (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
Model | A3C | Mustang |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2730 mm |