1967 Bristol 409 vs. 2010 Daihatsu Sirion

To start off, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion. (69 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion.

Because 1967 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion. (94 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion. 1967 Bristol 409 has automatic transmission and 2010 Daihatsu Sirion has manual transmission. 2010 Daihatsu Sirion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 Bristol 409 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Bristol 409 2010 Daihatsu Sirion
Make Bristol Daihatsu
Model 409 Sirion
Year Released 1967 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5210 cc 998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 215 HP 69 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 463 Nm 94 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 98.6 mm 71.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.1 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats