1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Toyota Mark II

To start off, 2001 Toyota Mark II is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Mark II. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Mark II.

Because 2001 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Mark II. (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Mark II.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Chevrolet Camaro 2001 Toyota Mark II
Make Chevrolet Toyota
Model Camaro Mark II
Year Released 1967 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4958 cc 1988 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 290 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 393 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.7 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.3 mm 75 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2610 mm