1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1966 Renault 10
To start off, 1967 DAF Daffodil is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 10 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Renault 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Renault 10 (42 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Renault 10 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Renault 10 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 1966 Renault 10 | |
| Make | DAF | Renault |
| Model | Daffodil | 10 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 42 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 38 L |
