1967 Ford Mustang vs. 1959 Saab 95
To start off, 1967 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 95 would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1959 Saab 95. (38 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1959 Saab 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Mustang weights approximately 277 kg more than 1959 Saab 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Mustang | 1959 Saab 95 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Mustang | 95 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 841 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |