1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 1963 NSU 1000 C
To start off, 1967 Jaguar 240 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 880 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 1963 NSU 1000 C | |
Make | Jaguar | NSU |
Model | 240 | 1000 C |
Year Released | 1967 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 39 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 7.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 44 L |