1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 7,410 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E (612 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 519 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E (848 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 715 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1998 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Cosmo | E |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 7410 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 612 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 848 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 2050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 75 L |