1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2004 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2004 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saab 03-Sep (210 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 630 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saab 03-Sep (300 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2004 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Mazda | Saab |
| Model | Cosmo | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1983 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 62 L |
