1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Megane (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 710 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Megane (192 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Megane |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |