1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2011 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2011 Ford Mustang is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Mustang (412 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 319 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Mustang weights approximately 747 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Mustang (528 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2011 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Cosmo | Mustang |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 5000 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 412 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 528 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 61 L |