1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 1978 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1978 Zastava 1300 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 360 kg more than 1978 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 1978 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Nissan | Zastava |
| Model | Cedric | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2430 mm |
