1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Fit (115 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 174 kg more than 2013 Honda Fit.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Fit. (144 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Cedric | Fit |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |
