1967 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1948 Simca 5
To start off, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 5 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1948 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1948 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 NSU Ro 80 | 1948 Simca 5 | |
| Make | NSU | Simca |
| Model | Ro 80 | 5 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1948 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2390 cc | 570 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2010 mm |
