1967 Renault 4 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 330 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Renault 4 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Renault | Renault |
| Model | 4 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 50 L |
