1967 Renault 4 vs. 2001 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2001 Toyota Camry is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Camry (160 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Camry weights approximately 710 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Renault 4 | 2001 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 4 | Camry |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 65 L |