1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 570 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Rover |
Model | Silver Shadow | 75 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2106 kg | 1536 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 65 L |