1967 Zastava 1500 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Matiz

To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Zastava 1500 (53 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Zastava 1500 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. (71 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1967 Zastava 1500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz.

Compare all specifications: