1968 Abarth OT vs. 1979 Austin Allegro
To start off, 1979 Austin Allegro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,944 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Austin Allegro weights approximately 5 kg more than 1968 Abarth OT.
Because 1968 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Abarth OT | 1979 Austin Allegro | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | OT | Allegro |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1944 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 48 L |
