1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 566 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 1996 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | Calais | 400 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 711 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 79 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2560 mm |
