1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 615 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | Dyane 6 | Apollo |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
