1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2012 Audi S5
To start off, 2012 Audi S5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi S5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi S5 weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2012 Audi S5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2012 Audi S5 | |
| Make | Citroen | Audi |
| Model | Dyane 6 | S5 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 354 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4623 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1382 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 64 L |
