1968 Ford 17 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1968 Ford 17. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford 17. (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford 17 | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 17 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |