1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1983 Renault Siete
To start off, 1983 Renault Siete is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1983 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 585 kg more than 1983 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1983 Renault Siete | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | Siete |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1106 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 44 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |
