1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Lotus Elise
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elise is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1996 Lotus Elise. (116 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1996 Lotus Elise. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 695 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elise. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Lotus Elise | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Fairlane | Elise |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 40 L |
