1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. (174 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 15 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Fairlane | Orlando |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6550 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |