1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Zastava 750
To start off, 1979 Zastava 750 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Mustang weights approximately 525 kg more than 1979 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Mustang | 1979 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Mustang | 750 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1979 |
| Engine Size | 4733 cc | 766 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2010 mm |
