1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1965 MG MGC
To start off, 1968 Holden Belmont is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (246 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 1965 MG MGC | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | Belmont | MGC |
Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3043 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 246 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2560 mm |