1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2000 Porsche 911
To start off, 2000 Porsche 911 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,387 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Porsche 911 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Porsche 911 (328 HP) has 234 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Porsche 911 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Porsche 911 (351 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2000 Porsche 911 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2000 Porsche 911 | |
| Make | Mazda | Porsche |
| Model | Cosmo | 911 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3387 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | boxer |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 328 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 351 Nm |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 286 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2370 mm |
