1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2011 Ford Escape
To start off, 2011 Ford Escape is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Escape (171 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Escape weights approximately 558 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Escape (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. 2011 Ford Escape has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Escape will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2011 Ford Escape | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Cosmo | Escape |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1498 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 66 L |