1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. 2012 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Cosmo | Matrix |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 132 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 50 L |