1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda R-100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda R-100 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | R-100 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 3010 mm |
