1968 MG MGC vs. 2002 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2002 Seat Arosa is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2002 Seat Arosa. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2002 Seat Arosa.
Because 1968 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Seat Arosa. (86 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1968 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
1968 MG MGC | 2002 Seat Arosa | |
Make | MG | Seat |
Model | MGC | Arosa |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 86 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2330 mm |