1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Proton 300 (88 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 300 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Proton 300 (126 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Proton 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Proton |
Model | Colt | 300 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1468 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2450 mm |