1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2005 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2005 Nissan Micra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Micra (88 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Micra weights approximately 137 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Micra (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 2005 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Colt | Micra |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1386 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1047 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2440 mm |