1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi TT (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi TT weights approximately 144 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi TT (349 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Audi TT | |
| Make | Nissan | Audi |
| Model | Cedric | TT |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2469 mm |
