1968 Triumph 2000 vs. 1999 Acura TL
To start off, 1999 Acura TL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura TL weights approximately 405 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Acura TL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Triumph 2000 | 1999 Acura TL | |
Make | Triumph | Acura |
Model | 2000 | TL |
Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 294 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |