1968 Triumph 2.5 vs. 1997 Kia Capital

To start off, 1997 Kia Capital is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1997 Kia Capital. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 1997 Kia Capital. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Kia Capital weights approximately 192 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.

Because 1968 Triumph 2.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Triumph 2.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Kia Capital, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Kia Capital. (152 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Kia Capital.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Triumph 2.5 1997 Kia Capital
Make Triumph Kia
Model 2.5 Capital
Year Released 1968 1997
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2498 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 150 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 222 Nm 152 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1133 kg 1325 kg
Vehicle Length 4420 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2530 mm