1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1956 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Toyota Master RR (40 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Toyota Master RR should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 572 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | Mini Clubman | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 40 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2540 mm |
