1969 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,950 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Camaro | Astro |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4950 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2790 mm |