1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 365 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Dodge | Riley |
| Model | Challenger | RM A |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 7206 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2870 mm |
