1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 233 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (317 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (545 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Challenger | R 390 GT1 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7206 cc | 3493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 550 HP |
| Torque | 545 Nm | 637 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2720 mm |
