1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 170 kg more than 2005 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (230 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Challenger | 6 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 545 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |