1969 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Fairlane | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2781 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |
